|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 228-232
Changing trends and clinical recommendations of denture adhesive in complete denture: A review
E Nagaraj1, Rony Tomy Kondody2, Aravind Kalambettu3, Dileep Nag Vinnakota4, Jangala Hari5
1 Department of Prosthodontics, PMNM Dental College and Hospitals, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ESIC Dental College, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
4 Department of Prosthodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
5 H Dental Clinic, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
|Date of Submission||02-Jun-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Jul-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Aug-2021|
Department of Prosthodontics, PMNM Dental College and Hospitals, Navanagar, Bagalkot - 587 103, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Over the past decade, the specialty of prosthodontics has witnessed a great deal of advancement in its treatment mechanics to improve the quality of complete dentures. Along with proper fabrication, various approaches such as retention by overdentures and the use of implants were widely used. Along with these, many patients use adhesive materials to increase the perceived sense of satisfaction. Whereas for patient well-being, long-term use of adhesives materials is not advocated or recommended in clinical practice. This review discusses various features, trends, and the need for clinical consideration for the application of denture adhesives in prosthodontic practice.
Keywords: Complete deanture, denture adhesive, prosthodontic practice
|How to cite this article:|
Nagaraj E, Kondody RT, Kalambettu A, Vinnakota DN, Hari J. Changing trends and clinical recommendations of denture adhesive in complete denture: A review. J Dent Res Rev 2021;8:228-32
|How to cite this URL:|
Nagaraj E, Kondody RT, Kalambettu A, Vinnakota DN, Hari J. Changing trends and clinical recommendations of denture adhesive in complete denture: A review. J Dent Res Rev [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 26];8:228-32. Available from: https://www.jdrr.org/text.asp?2021/8/3/228/324424
| Introduction|| |
Accuracy in denture fabrication and efficient psychological counseling of the patient is critical for the success of any complete denture treatment. In addition, even the most successful clinician has difficulty in meeting the patient's complete expectations for denture stability and retention, and it is in that case, it is considered to be appropriate to prescribe a denture adhesive.
Over the years, there was always a negative approach or controversies toward the application of adhesives. The basic components include a polymer salt blend that improves hydration sensitivity, rapid onset, longer duration of action, resistance, and ease of maintenance.
Denture adhesives also may be advantageous to provide psychological benefits since they can provide stability during public interactions. However, it must not be a method to increase the retention of improperly fabricated dentures. Along with the availability of adhesive, there must be standardized protocol when to use and how to use denture adhesives.
According to the study of Zarb et al., the “denture adhesive” defines as a nontoxic, commercially available, soluble material that improves retention, stability, and function. The first case of adhesive use and its importance was described in 1913. It was classified as nonmedical products by the American Dental Association Council until 1935.,
Although many denture wearers use denture adhesive, dental practitioners have been slow to appreciate its effectiveness for denture retention. The primary factors influencing a patient's choice of adhesive product are patient comfort and ease of use.
Over the last decade, there have been extraordinary achievements and changes in the field of prosthodontics along with advancements in treatment mechanics that improve quality of life. The main focus of this narrative review is to provide a detailed as well as a comprehensive summary of trends and clinical aspects of denture adhesive in the field of prosthodontic practice.
| Changing Concept from Past to Present|| |
Even though denture adhesives have been used since the late 18th century, the first published study dated from 1960. Initially, denture adhesives were created by combining vegetable oils. When they absorbed saliva, they formed a mucilaginous substratum that adhered to the tissues and the prosthesis. Calcium salts were added in the 1970s, and zinc was added to previous formulations in the 1980s to improve the effectiveness of denture adhesives. Nowadays, these materials are available in various forms. For soluble adhesives, they come in the form of powders, pastes, or creams, whereas for insoluble materials, they come in the form of strips or cushions.,,
In the presence of water or saliva, synthetic agents in the soluble group rely on the chemical properties of the active ingredients to increase their volume from 50% to 150% and become viscous and sticky, filling the gap between the prosthesis base and the underlying surface. The active ingredients are polymer salts with varying degrees of water solubility that are intended to produce both short- and long-acting adhesives. These salts include carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and methylcellulose, as well as polymethyl vinyl ether-maleic anhydrade (PVM-MA).
The CMC salts have good initial retention, but due to their high solubility, they dissolve rapidly and lose their effectiveness. The PVM-MA salts, on the other hand, have low solubility, which requires more time to get activated and have a longer period of action. Following that, calcium and zinc salts were added to denture adhesive formulations to improve their effectiveness.
Over the years, various studies have been conducted in the field of prosthodontics related to the use of adhesive. Kapur studied 26 denture wearers and devised a method for assessing denture retention and stability. He concluded that adhesives improved retention, which will improve denture wearers' incisive ability.
Stafford and Russell conducted a study using radio telemetry to measure pressure changes at the denture base–mucosa interface with and without adhesives. The study concluded that denture adhesive allowed for greater occlusal pressure.
Tarbet et al. investigated the role of adhesives in denture retention and stability and discovered that patients perceived improved chewing ability, confidence, and comfort, as well as reduced wobble and food particle collection under the denture.
In their studies, Panagiotouni et al. discovered that denture adhesive materials had a higher retentive ability than saliva and that when the adhesives were combined with artificial saliva, their retentive ability was significantly increased. According to their research, Abdelmelak and Michael found that the cushioning effect of denture adhesives reduced the pressure and friction transmitted to the underlying mucosa.
Denture adhesive must be used in cases of severely atrophied ridges, ridges with hypertrophied tissue, in case of reduced neuromuscular control, xerostomia, and maxillofacial defects that provide inadequate tissue support, according to Jagger and Harrison.
Chowdhry et al., about various forms of adhesive material, concluded that the paste form is considered to be more resistant to dislodgement than the powder form. Psillakis et al., found that denture adhesive improved patients' self-confidence. Whereas there was no difference in self-confidence levels in patients with various ridge conditions.
According to Figueiral et al., intraoral transducers examined the retentive support of various adhesives on maxillary complete dentures and found that adhesives improved retention and stability, thereby increasing confidence and comfort among patients.
A study by Shamsolketabi S et al. found no significant differences in retention and improvement in chewing in patients with different ridge conditions whereas about 24.4% of cases faced difficulty in cleaning the adhesive material.
| Composition and Mechanism of Action|| |
Denture adhesive augments the retentive mechanism when a denture is worn. This is achieved by optimizing interfacial forces by increasing the adhesive and cohesive properties as well as the viscosity of the medium between the denture and soft tissue and also by preventing the formation of air columns between the surfaces of the denture and basal seat.
Furthermore, the presence of free carboxyl groups produced by adhesive hydration results in more cohesive adhesion than saliva.
Constituents of denture adhesive can be classified into three groups.
- Group 1: Synthetic polymers, karaya gum, tragacanth, acacia, pectin, gelatin, hydroxyl-methyl cellulose and sodium CMC are examples of adhesive agents
- Group 2: Hexachlorophene, sodium borate, sodium tetraborate, and ethanol are antimicrobial agents
- Group 3: (Additional agents) Additives, plasticizers, and wetting agents come in a variety of forms.
| Method of Application of Denture Adhesives|| |
It is the sole responsibility of the prosthodontist to educate patients about denture adhesive, including its use, abuse, benefits, drawbacks, and available options. The decision between cream and powder is largely subjective, but certain facts may influence a patient's choice.
Various steps in the application of denture adhesive were as follows:
- The tissue-bearing surface is thoroughly cleaned without any injury with the help of wipes, cotton applicators, and orange solvent
- The entire mucosal surface must be devoid of food debris, saliva, and previously used adhesive materials
- The adhesive is applied to the underside of the denture, and it is important to keep the surface moist before applying it [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
- When applying adhesive to maxillary dentures, consider areas of the alveolus, superior surface of the palate, and posterior palatal seal
- For mandibular dentures, it is applied on anterior and posterior regions of the tissue-bearing area.
Hand pressure is used to seat the denture properly (10 s)
- Excessive material should carefully be removed immediately with the help of cotton
- Care must be taken to close the jaws in centric occlusion to evenly distribute adhesive in the form of a thin layer.
| Application of Denture Adhesives in Modern Prosthodontic Care|| |
The complex interplay of different forces related to soft- and hard-tissue anatomy, patient-dependent variables, prosthesis fabrication, and surface properties is recognized as the cause of denture retention in the oral cavity., Previous studies have confirmed the benefits observed with denture adhesive use.,,
Because of the increased retention and stability, the forces during chewing increase, resulting in fewer strokes during swallowing. It also helps in the distribution of forces on the appliance, a reduction in food debris accumulation, and a reduction in fungal growth.,
Denture adhesive is indicated in conditions where well-fabricated denture does not satisfy a patient expectation of stability and retention. Therefore, various indications include the following:,
- Denture adhesives help to stabilize trial bases that show reduced retention and stability, as well as to reduce patient anxiety about the final prosthesis fit
- In cases of compromised denture-bearing areas, adhesive helps to add confidence thereby it helps in patient adaptation
- Aid in soft-tissue healing, reducing compression or irritation of the oral mucosa
- In cases of maxillofacial defects that require prosthesis, adhesives act like a cushion
- Denture adhesives are an important tool for retaining radiation protection prostheses
- Denture adhesives can be used to treat xerostomia caused by drugs or radiation. Patients with xerostomia must be educated on the importance of moisturizing surfaces before seating
- In various neurological conditions, the adhesive will help to overcome the impediment imposed.
| Contraindications|| |
Long-term use of denture adhesive without proper follow-up was never an option in the clinical scenario. Multiple factors and conditions should be taken into account while advising the use of denture adhesive. Various systemical and medical factors complicate the daily use of adhesive material even in creams and powdered forms.
Various contraindications include the following:
- Allergy to adhesive materials is one of the most common contraindications, so it is always advised to evaluate patients for any hypersensitive reactions
- Severe mandibular or maxillary atrophy along with ill-fitting dentures is not a good scenario for the application of adhesive
- For patients with severe soft-tissue defects or loss of vertical dimension, it is advised for new dentures rather than the usage of denture adhesive
- A broken or poorly fabricated denture should not be retained by using an adhesive.
- Improved complete denture retention and stability
- Increases patient satisfaction, confidence, and security in chewing
- Incisal bite force exerted by well-fitting dentures during chewing is significantly improved
- The frequency of dislodgement of the denture during chewing is markedly decreased
- Mucosal tissue underlying adhesive shows reduced inflammation in a patient who maintains good oral hygiene.
- Some patients object to the grainy texture of the powder
- Some patients are unable to tolerate the taste or odor of semi-dissolved adhesive material that escapes from the posterior region's peripheries
- Difficulties removing adhesive from dentures and oral surfaces
- The more viscous the adhesive pastes produce a greater error in vertical dimension and denture positioning because of their reduced flow characteristics
- Because an ill-fitting denture is frequently retained by a large amount of adhesive material, a patient may be misled into ignoring the need for professional assistance.
Changing Trends in Denture Adhesive
Over the years, various materials have been evolved in the field of prosthodontics. Early materials of denture adhesives contain zinc that was removed from the market because of the development of copper deficiency, which was causing various neurologic diseases., Nations et al. discovered a possible link between overuse of denture cream and hyperzincemia, hypocupremia, and various neurological signs and symptoms. Excessive zinc ingestion is caused by ill-fitting dentures. To reduce various complications created by this compound, the current trend is the development of zinc-free products (for example, GlaxoSmithKline's Super Poligrip “Free”) which is considered to be more effective and minimal side effects.
The use of additives that contain various antimicrobial and antifungal agents has become more popular and being advocated in edentulous patients who are subjected to various diseases like candidiasis. These materials could be used as part of a drug delivery system in future by incorporating various agents that could potentially benefit in reducing irritation and inflammation of the tissue.
Furthermore, one current challenge is the development of denture adhesives that do not allow food or even bacterial plaque to adhere to them, allowing them to be used for longer periods without the need for daily exchanges. Moreover, it was discovered that current material manufacturers have not yet found a way to deal with the challenge of maintaining their properties for longer periods.
| Conclusion|| |
Clinical use of denture adhesive is always a controversial topic in the field of prosthodontic society. Scientific evidence favoring the support of routine and safe use is lacking, yet clinical experience indicates that judicious use of denture adhesive is always welcomed since it could always provide comfort, retention, and stability to the denture in many clinical scenarios. In future, further development in denture adhesive material is very much necessary to provide better quality material, patients' satisfaction, and minimal complications.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Al-Abdulla IH, Khamas AM. The effect of three different denture adhesives on the retention of a mandibular complete denture (comparative study). J Bagh Coll Dent 2009;21:5-9.
Adisman IK. The use of denture adhesives as an aid to denture treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:711-5.
Grasso JE. Denture adhesives. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:721-33, vii.
Slaughter A, Katz RV, Grasso JE. Professional attitudes toward denture adhesives: A Delphi technique survey of academic prosthodontists. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:80-9.
Duqum I, Powers KA, Cooper L, Felton D. Denture adhesive use in complete dentures: Clinical recommendations and review of the literature. Gen Dent 2012;60:467-77.
Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Eckert SE, Jacob RF, Fenton AH, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients: Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004. p. 442.
Yankell SL. Overview of research and literature on denture adhesives. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1984;Suppl 4:S18-21.
Tautin FS. Dental adhesives – A problem. Dent Surv 1978;54:24-6.
DeVengencie J, Ng MC, Ford P, Iacopino AM. In vitro
evaluation of denture adhesives: Possible efficacy of complex carbohydrates. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:61-72.
Bogucki ZA. Clinical aspects of the use of dental adhesive materials in patients with chronic xerostomia. Gerodontology 2013;30:162-6.
Chen F, Wu T, Cheng X. Cytotoxic effects of denture adhesives on primary human oral keratinocytes, fibroblasts and permanent L929 cell lines. Gerodontology 2014;31:4-10.
Sampaio-Maia B, Figueiral MH, Sousa-Rodrigues P, Fernandes MH, Scully C. The effect of denture adhesives on Candida albicans growth in vitro
. Gerodontology 2012;29:e348-56.
de Oliveira da Rosa WL, de Oliveira SG, Rosa CH, da Silva AF, Lund RG, Piva E. Current trends and future perspectives in the development of denture adhesives: An overview based on technological monitoring process and systematic review. J Biomed Sci 2015;4:1.
Kapur KK. A clinical evaluation of denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1967;18:550-8.
Stafford GO, Russell C. Efficiency of denture adhesives and their possible influences on oral microorganisms. J Dent Res 1971;50:832-7.
Tarbet WJ, Boone M, Schmidt NF. Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:374-8.
Panagiotouni E, Pissiotis A, Kapari D, Kaloyannides A. Retentive ability of various denture adhesive materials: An in vitro
study. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:578-85.
Abdelmalek RG, Michael CG. The effect of denture adhesives on the palatal mucosa under complete dentures. A clinical and histological investigation. Egypt Dent J 1978;24:419-30.
Jagger DC, Harrison A. Denture fixatives – An update for general dental practice. Br Dent J 1996;180:311-3.
Chowdhry P, Phukela SS, Patil R, Yadav H. A study to evaluate the retentive ability of different denture adhesive materials: An in vitro
study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2010;10:176-81.
Psillakis JJ, Wright RF, Grbic JT, Lamster IB. In practice evaluation of a denture adhesive using a gnathometer. J Prosthodont 2004;13:244-50.
Figueiral MH, Fonseca PA, Pereira-Leite C, Scully C. The effect of different adhesive materials on retention of maxillary complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:175-7.
Shamsolketabi S, Nili M. The effect of denture adhesive on the efficiency of complete denture in patients with different alveolar ridges. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018;15:271-5.
Reittrnr W. Effect of adhesive powders on the fit and position of complete denture. Dent Abstr 1957;2:154.
Stafford GD. Denture adhesives – A review of their uses and compositions. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1970;21:17-9.
Polyzois GL. An update on denture fixatives. Dent Update 1983;10:579-80, 582-3.
Barbenel JC. Physical retention of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:592-600.
Lindstrom RE, Pawelchak J, Heyd A, Tarbet WJ. Physical-chemical aspects of denture retention and stability: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:371-5.
Swartz ML, Norman RD, Phillips RW. A method of measuring retention of denture adherents: An in vivo
study. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:456-63.
Stafford GD, Russell C. Efficiency of denture adhesives and their possible influence on oral microorganisms. J Dent Res 1971;50:832-6.
Neill DJ, Roberts BJ. The effect of denture fixatives on masticatory performance in complete denture patients. J Dent 1973;1:219-22.
Yadav A, Yadav S. Denture adhesives - Their stand in prosthodontics. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5:62-4. [Full text]
Scher EA, Ritchie GM, Flowers DJ. Antimycotic denture adhesive in treatment of denture stomatitis. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:622-7.
Boone M. Analysis of soluble and insoluble denture adhesives and their relationship to tissue irritation and bone resorption. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1984;Suppl 4:S22-5.
Salman YM, Ibrahim IK. Effect of denture adhesives on the retention of maxillary complete denture. J Coll Dent 2005;17:30-4.
Kumar PR, Shajahan PA, Mathew J, Koruthu A, Aravind P, Ahammed MF. Denture adhesives in prosthodontics: An overview. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:93-5.
Chandrakala V, Deepmala S. Prospective of denture adhesives in prosthodontics: A review. Int J Oral Care Res 2020;8:8-10.
Hogan WJ. Allergic reaction of adhesive denture powders. N Y State Dent J 1954;20:65.
Nations SP, Boyer PJ, Love LA, Burritt MF, Butz JA, Wolfe GI, et al.
Denture cream: An unusual source of excess zinc, leading to hypocupremia and neurologic disease. Neurology 2008;71:639-43.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]